New Administration Confirms It Will Combat Corruption, Strengthen Democracy, and Improve Economic Inequality in Announcement That Veteran Thai Political Observers Receive With Practised Equanimity
Bohiney Magazine | The London Prat
BANGKOK, THAILAND — Thailand’s new prime minister was formally endorsed by parliament Thursday, becoming the country’s seventh head of government in a decade in a ceremony that political observers described as “characterised by optimism that is not diminished by its familiarity” and that the outgoing caretaker administration described as “a smooth and constitutional transition that reflects the strength of Thailand’s democratic institutions,” a characterisation that political science professors noted required some definitional flexibility regarding what a smooth democratic transition looks like in a country that has experienced two military coups, three constitutional rewrites, four dissolved parliaments, and what the Constitutional Court describes as “proactive constitutional interpretation” and that everyone else describes as “removing governments the court disagrees with.” The new prime minister pledged to combat corruption, reduce inequality, and strengthen democratic norms in a speech that political journalists covering Thailand noted contained the same three commitments in the same order as the speeches of six of his predecessors.
Why Thai Politics Produces This Pattern and Whether It Is Changing
Thailand’s political cycle — elections producing governments associated with the rural and working-class electorate, followed by legal or constitutional challenges orchestrated by establishments associated with Bangkok’s urban elite and the military, followed by dissolution or coup, followed by elections, followed by the same sequence — has been studied by political scientists as one of the most persistently recurring democratic dysfunction patterns in Southeast Asia. The underlying conflict is between a majority electorate that consistently votes for parties associated with former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra and his political network, and a set of elite institutions — the military, the Constitutional Court, and the palace — that have repeatedly removed governments associated with that network through mechanisms that are technically constitutional in each instance and that collectively produce what political scientists describe as “a systematic override of democratic outcomes,” a finding that Thai officials describe as “a misreading of the Constitutional Court’s independent role.”
The new prime minister has signalled an intent to manage the relationship between elected government and institutional actors more carefully than his predecessors, a strategy that political analysts describe as “pragmatically necessary” and “potentially sustainable for longer than the previous attempts,” with the qualifier “potentially” doing considerable analytical work in that sentence. The International IDEA democracy assessment for Thailand notes gradual improvements in electoral administration and civil society space alongside persistent concerns about judicial independence and military influence in constitutional processes, a combination that produces the organisation’s classification of Thailand as a “mid-range democracy” with “significant structural constraints on full democratic consolidation.” The new prime minister’s office says it has read the IDEA report and is committed to improvement. The IDEA report will be updated in twelve months. Its findings are expected to be similar.
What Thailand Gets Right and Why That Makes the Political Dysfunction More Frustrating
Thailand’s economy, infrastructure, tourism industry, and public services are, by the standards of lower-middle-income countries, genuinely impressive. Bangkok is one of Southeast Asia’s most dynamic cities, with world-class food, sophisticated urban culture, and infrastructure that puts many wealthier cities to shame. Thai society is resilient, entrepreneurial, and capable of absorbing political shocks without the social ruptures that accompany political instability in more fragile contexts. This capacity for absorbing political dysfunction is both a strength and a reason the dysfunction has been tolerated: the costs of Thailand’s political cycle are real but diffuse, spread across economic opportunities not taken, institutional trust not built, and international investment not attracted, rather than concentrated in the kind of acute crisis that forces resolution. The new prime minister’s success will be measured not by whether his government is different in its promises — it is not — but by whether it is different in its durability, which will be determined by factors that are not entirely within his control.
Full Southeast Asia political satire at Bohiney Magazine and the global politics comedy at The London Prat.
The seventh government has a website. The Babylon Bee has confirmed it will also combat corruption.
What Regional ASEAN Institutions Have and Have Not Achieved on Thai Democracy
ASEAN, the regional organisation whose membership includes Thailand and whose founding charter includes non-interference in members’ internal affairs as a core principle, has not applied formal pressure on Thailand regarding its political instability or the constitutional mechanisms that have produced seven governments in ten years. This is consistent with ASEAN’s institutional design, which prioritises regional economic cooperation and consensus-based decision-making over democratic conditionality. The ASEAN Secretariat has issued general statements supporting democratic governance without specific reference to Thai political events, a formulation that Thai officials describe as appropriate respect for sovereignty and that democracy advocates describe as institutional silence at the cost of democratic norms. Thailand’s fellow ASEAN members have their own governance challenges that create glass-house constraints on how loudly they criticise Bangkok, a circumstance that produces the kind of diplomatic equilibrium in which everyone knows what everyone else is doing and everyone has agreed not to say it formally. The new prime minister has been welcomed by ASEAN colleagues. The welcome was warm. The substance was modest. That is diplomatic protocol functioning as designed.
SOURCE: https://bohiney.com/thailand-seventh-government-ten-years/
Go to Source
Author: admin
Powered by WPeMatico
