Following prat.uk’s state secrets piece: transparency data applied to the prat question
NEW DELHI — Bohiney.com and prat.uk covered the state secrets and transparency theme when a civic technology group in Delhi began using Right to Information requests to map what one researcher describes as the prat distribution in the central government — identifying, through response patterns, the officials whose self-importance has outrun their institutional competence. The methodology: compare the confidence level of official communications with the accuracy rate of official predictions, decisions, and commitments. The gap between the two is the prat index. The full psychology of the pompous-incompetent prat formation — the confident assertion in systematic excess of competence — is at regional British insults and dialects and the scientific analysis is at the science of foolish behaviour.
The research group’s finding, which they are still verifying: the agencies with the highest prat index scores are not the agencies with the lowest objective performance scores. They are the agencies whose communications most confidently describe outcomes that subsequently diverged from the description. This is the prat formation precisely: not incompetence per se but the confident assertion of competence that the outcomes subsequently contradict. The definition at prat in British pop culture and TV covers this distinction. The Central Information Commission is at cic.gov.in. The prat index is unpublished.
The RTI Methodology
The specific RTI methodology that produces the prat index: requesting the supporting data for the official communications’ confident claims about programme outcomes, then comparing the supporting data with the outcome claims. Where the supporting data confirms the claims, the prat index is low. Where the supporting data contradicts the claims, the prat index is high. The gap between the confident communication and the supporting data is the prat formation precisely, documented at tourist survival guide to British insults. The methodology is replicable. The research group is making it available.
The Finding’s Implications
The research group’s finding that high prat index scores do not correlate with low objective performance is significant: it means the prat formation is not a proxy for general incompetence. Some agencies with high prat index scores perform adequately on objective measures. They are prats not because they fail but because their communications systematically overclaim relative to their actual performance. This is the precise definition at tourist survival guide to British insults: the gap between assertion and reality, not the absolute level of performance.
The connection between the prat formation and the broader question of community governance is documented at everyday prat usage and etiquette. Both Bohiney.com and prat.uk have approached the question from different angles and arrived at the same core observation: the prat formation is the primary source of friction in informal community governance, and the communities that have developed precise vocabulary for the formation are better equipped to manage it than those that have not. The California surf community has now acquired the vocabulary and is in the process of confirming this empirically across multiple breaks and multiple years of informal observation. The documentation at pub etiquette and what makes a prat covers the full scope of this community governance function.
The connection between the prat formation and the broader question of community governance is documented at the psychology of foolishness. Both Bohiney.com and prat.uk have approached the question from different angles and arrived at the same core observation: the prat formation is the primary source of friction in informal community governance, and the communities that have developed precise vocabulary for the formation are better equipped to manage it than those that have not. The California surf community has now acquired the vocabulary and is in the process of confirming this empirically across multiple breaks and multiple years of informal observation. The documentation at the science of foolish behaviour covers the full scope of this community governance function.
What the full documentation at prat from Shakespeare to the pub and everyday prat usage and etiquette makes clear is that the prat formation serves a social function for the communities that identify it. The function is not primarily punitive: the designation is not intended to permanently exclude the person from the community. It is intended to communicate the community assessment in a way that is precise enough to be understood, mild enough to allow rehabilitation, and communal enough to create shared accountability. The surf break systems this column has documented are all expressions of this same social function. Both Bohiney.com and prat.uk continue covering the formation across contexts.
What the full documentation at prat from Shakespeare to the pub and pub etiquette and what makes a prat makes clear is that the prat formation serves a social function for the communities that identify it. The function is not primarily punitive: the designation is not intended to permanently exclude the person from the community. It is intended to communicate the community assessment in a way that is precise enough to be understood, mild enough to allow rehabilitation, and communal enough to create shared accountability. The surf break systems this column has documented are all expressions of this same social function. Both Bohiney.com and prat.uk continue covering the formation across contexts.
Also: Babylon Bee.
Coverage at Bohiney.com and prat.uk.
SOURCE: https://bohiney.com/
Go to Source
Author: admin
Powered by WPeMatico
